Loading
Assembling your view…
Crunching costs, sorting signals, rendering insights.
Crunching costs, sorting signals, rendering insights.
Can you afford Thiruvananthapuram on a ₹7L salary? Rent would be 17% of gross monthly income — within the recommended 30% threshold. Budget breakdown vs Kerala peers below.
Can you afford Thiruvananthapuram on a ₹7L salary? Rent would be 17% of gross monthly income — within the recommended 30% threshold. Budget breakdown vs Kerala peers below.
Thiruvananthapuram: cost index 88 (-5 vs national avg 93), rent ₹10,000/month.
Kerala region average cost index: 93. Thiruvananthapuram is -5 vs region peers.
Quality of life: 70/100 — safety 75, healthcare 80, walkability 38.
Safety score: 75/100 (crime rate 28.2/1k). National average: 62/100.
On a ₹7L salary, rent in Thiruvananthapuram is 17% of gross monthly income — within the 30% rule.
| # | City | Cost Index | Rent/mo | Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Thiruvananthapuram | 88 | ₹10,000 | ₹4,40,000 |
| 2 | Raipur | 68 | ₹7,000 | ₹3,40,000 |
| 3 | Patna | 68 | ₹7,500 | ₹3,20,000 |
| 4 | Ranchi | 70 | ₹7,500 | ₹3,50,000 |
| 5 | Bhubaneswar | 72 | ₹8,000 | ₹3,60,000 |
| 6 | Bhopal | 72 | ₹8,500 | ₹3,60,000 |
| 7 | Indore | 75 | ₹9,000 | ₹3,80,000 |
| 8 | Guwahati | 75 | ₹9,000 | ₹3,80,000 |
| 9 | Nagpur | 78 | ₹10,000 | ₹4,20,000 |
| 10 | Coimbatore | 82 | ₹10,000 | ₹4,20,000 |
| 11 | Surat | 82 | ₹10,000 | ₹4,50,000 |
| 12 | Visakhapatnam | 82 | ₹10,000 | ₹4,20,000 |
| 13 | Dehradun | 82 | ₹10,000 | ₹4,20,000 |
| 14 | Lucknow | 78 | ₹10,000 | ₹4,00,000 |
| 15 | Jaipur | 85 | ₹11,000 | ₹4,20,000 |
| 16 | Kolkata | 88 | ₹12,000 | ₹4,50,000 |
| 17 | Ahmedabad | 88 | ₹12,000 | ₹4,80,000 |
| 18 | Kochi | 95 | ₹12,000 | ₹4,80,000 |
| 19 | Chandigarh | 98 | ₹14,000 | ₹5,20,000 |
| 20 | Panaji | 105 | ₹15,000 | ₹4,80,000 |
Here's what the headline numbers don't tell you: Thiruvananthapuram has a cost index of 88 — 5 points below the India national average of 93. Median income is ₹4,40,000 with rent at ₹10,000/month, putting the rent-to-income ratio at 27%. This is where the math gets real for actual people.
And there's one more thing: looking at Kerala as a whole, the spread across all 28 cities is 54 points on the cost index. Mumbai sits at the other end with index 142 and rent of ₹35,000/mo. That's a strong position by any measure.
On quality of life, Thiruvananthapuram scores a composite score of 70/100 — reflecting its safety (75), healthcare (80), and walkability (38) metrics. Layer in taxes, though, and the math changes. affordability and QoL don't always move in the same direction, and India is a good example of that tension.
Thiruvananthapuram — cost index 88, rent ₹10,000/mo, income ₹4,40,000, QoL 70/100.
Raipur — cost index 68, rent ₹7,000/mo, income ₹3,40,000, QoL 59/100.
Patna — cost index 68, rent ₹7,500/mo, income ₹3,20,000, QoL 51/100.
Ranchi — cost index 70, rent ₹7,500/mo, income ₹3,50,000, QoL 59/100.
Bhubaneswar — cost index 72, rent ₹8,000/mo, income ₹3,60,000, QoL 63/100.
Thiruvananthapuram has a cost index of 88 (national avg: 93), rent ₹10,000/mo, median income ₹4,40,000/yr, and a quality of life score of 70/100.
In Thiruvananthapuram, rent would be about 17% of your gross monthly income on ₹7L. Well within the recommended 30% threshold.
The Kerala region of average QoL score is 57/100. Thiruvananthapuram leads with 70/100, reflecting safety, healthcare access, walkability, and green space.
Our index is benchmarked to 100 (national median). Sub-categories cover housing, food, transport, utilities, and healthcare. Data sources include MoSPI CPI, RBI, NHB RESIDEX, PLFS.
Thiruvananthapuram: cost index 88, rent ₹10,000/mo, income ₹4,40,000/yr, QoL 70/100. Raipur: cost index 68, rent ₹7,000/mo, income ₹3,40,000/yr, QoL 59/100.
This analysis uses data from MoSPI CPI, RBI, NHB RESIDEX, PLFS to rank cities in India. The cost of living index is benchmarked to 100 (national median). Quality of life scores combine safety, healthcare, walkability, air quality, green space, and transit metrics. Salary ranges use national occupation data adjusted for local cost differences. Data is updated regularly to reflect current market conditions.