Loading
Assembling your view…
Crunching costs, sorting signals, rendering insights.
Crunching costs, sorting signals, rendering insights.
Southampton vs Aberdeen in 2026: cost index 110 vs 95, rent £1,050 vs £750, income £33,500 vs £34,000, QoL 57 vs 66.
Southampton vs Aberdeen in 2026: cost index 110 vs 95, rent £1,050 vs £750, income £33,500 vs £34,000, QoL 57 vs 66.
Southampton ranks #1 with a cost index of 110 and rent of £1,050/month.
Average cost index across these cities: 103 (+4 vs national average of 99).
Average quality of life: 62/100. Top: Southampton at 57/100.
Safest city: Aberdeen (70/100 safety score).
Here's where the conversation shifts from 'affordable' to 'strategic': Southampton stands out as the top-ranked city in this analysis. With a cost index of 110 and median income of £33,500, it offers competitive value despite costs slightly above the national median. This combination is rare — and valuable.
On quality of life, Aberdeen leads with a composite score of 66/100 — reflecting its safety (70), healthcare (76), and walkability (68) metrics. Here's where it gets complicated: affordability and QoL don't always move in the same direction, and United Kingdom is a good example of that tension.
The country average QoL score is 61/100. Southampton leads with 57/100, reflecting its safety, healthcare access, walkability, and green space.
Our index is benchmarked to 100 (national median). Sub-categories cover housing, food, transport, utilities, and healthcare. Data sources include ONS, Land Registry, HMRC.
Southampton (ranked #1) has a cost index of 110 and rent of £1,050/mo. Aberdeen (#2) has index 95 and rent £750/mo — a 15-point gap.