Loading
Assembling your view…
Crunching costs, sorting signals, rendering insights.
Crunching costs, sorting signals, rendering insights.
London vs Liverpool in 2026: cost index 138 vs 88, rent £1,850 vs £750, income £40,300 vs £29,000, QoL 57 vs 58.
London vs Liverpool in 2026: cost index 138 vs 88, rent £1,850 vs £750, income £40,300 vs £29,000, QoL 57 vs 58.
London ranks #1 with a cost index of 138 and rent of £1,850/month.
Average cost index across these cities: 113 (+14 vs national average of 99).
Average quality of life: 58/100. Top: London at 57/100.
Safest city: London (58/100 safety score).
Most comparisons stop at rent. We didn't. London stands out as the top-ranked city in this analysis. With a cost index of 138 and median income of £40,300, it offers competitive value despite costs slightly above the national median. This combination is rare — and valuable.
On quality of life, Liverpool leads with a composite score of 58/100 — reflecting its safety (52), healthcare (70), and walkability (72) metrics. Context matters here. affordability and QoL don't always move in the same direction, and United Kingdom is a good example of that tension.
The country average QoL score is 61/100. London leads with 57/100, reflecting its safety, healthcare access, walkability, and green space.
Our index is benchmarked to 100 (national median). Sub-categories cover housing, food, transport, utilities, and healthcare. Data sources include ONS, Land Registry, HMRC.
London (ranked #1) has a cost index of 138 and rent of £1,850/mo. Liverpool (#2) has index 88 and rent £750/mo — a 50-point gap.