Loading
Assembling your view…
Crunching costs, sorting signals, rendering insights.
Crunching costs, sorting signals, rendering insights.
London vs Bristol in 2026: cost index 138 vs 108, rent £1,850 vs £1,100, income £40,300 vs £34,000, QoL 57 vs 62.
London vs Bristol in 2026: cost index 138 vs 108, rent £1,850 vs £1,100, income £40,300 vs £34,000, QoL 57 vs 62.
London ranks #1 with a cost index of 138 and rent of £1,850/month.
Average cost index across these cities: 123 (+24 vs national average of 99).
Average quality of life: 60/100. Top: London at 57/100.
Safest city: Bristol (63/100 safety score).
Here's the finding that keeps coming up in different analyses: London stands out as the top-ranked city in this analysis. With a cost index of 138 and median income of £40,300, it offers competitive value despite costs slightly above the national median. That ratio is hard to beat anywhere else.
On quality of life, Bristol leads with a composite score of 62/100 — reflecting its safety (63), healthcare (78), and walkability (72) metrics. Context matters here. affordability and QoL don't always move in the same direction, and United Kingdom is a good example of that tension.
The country average QoL score is 61/100. London leads with 57/100, reflecting its safety, healthcare access, walkability, and green space.
Our index is benchmarked to 100 (national median). Sub-categories cover housing, food, transport, utilities, and healthcare. Data sources include ONS, Land Registry, HMRC.
London (ranked #1) has a cost index of 138 and rent of £1,850/mo. Bristol (#2) has index 108 and rent £1,100/mo — a 30-point gap.