Loading
Assembling your view…
Crunching costs, sorting signals, rendering insights.
Crunching costs, sorting signals, rendering insights.
London vs Birmingham in 2026: cost index 142 vs 97, rent £2,000 vs £950, income £42,500 vs £32,200, QoL 56 vs 56.
London vs Birmingham in 2026: cost index 142 vs 97, rent £2,000 vs £950, income £42,500 vs £32,200, QoL 56 vs 56.
London: cost index 142 (+39 vs national avg 103), rent £2,000/month.
London region average cost index: 120. London is +22 vs region peers.
Quality of life: 56/100 — safety 58, healthcare 82, walkability 89.
Safety score: 58/100 (crime rate 95.1/1k). National average: 61/100.
Strip away assumptions, and something unexpected emerges. London has a cost index of 142 — 39 points above the United Kingdom national average of 103. Median income is £42,500 with rent at £2,000/month, putting the rent-to-income ratio at 56%. For anyone running the numbers, this is where it clicks.
On quality of life, London scores a composite score of 56/100 — reflecting its safety (58), healthcare (82), and walkability (89) metrics. But here's the flip side: affordability and QoL don't always move in the same direction, and United Kingdom is a good example of that tension.
London has a cost index of 142 (national avg: 103), rent £2,000/mo, median income £42,500/yr, and a quality of life score of 56/100.
The London region of average QoL score is 56/100. London leads with 56/100, reflecting safety, healthcare access, walkability, and green space.
Our index is benchmarked to 100 (national median). Sub-categories cover housing, food, transport, utilities, and healthcare. Data sources include ONS, Land Registry, HMRC.
London: cost index 142, rent £2,000/mo, income £42,500/yr, QoL 56/100. Birmingham: cost index 97, rent £950/mo, income £32,200/yr, QoL 56/100.