Loading
Assembling your view…
Crunching costs, sorting signals, rendering insights.
Crunching costs, sorting signals, rendering insights.
Birmingham vs Newcastle upon Tyne in 2026: cost index 97 vs 89, rent £950 vs £800, income £32,200 vs £30,500, QoL 56 vs 63.
Birmingham vs Newcastle upon Tyne in 2026: cost index 97 vs 89, rent £950 vs £800, income £32,200 vs £30,500, QoL 56 vs 63.
Birmingham: cost index 97 (-6 vs national avg 103), rent £950/month.
West Midlands region average cost index: 93. Birmingham is +4 vs region peers.
Quality of life: 56/100 — safety 52, healthcare 70, walkability 68.
Safety score: 52/100 (crime rate 103.2/1k). National average: 61/100.
What jumps out immediately: Birmingham has a cost index of 97 — 6 points below the United Kingdom national average of 103. Median income is £32,200 with rent at £950/month, putting the rent-to-income ratio at 35%. That's a strong position by any measure.
On quality of life, Birmingham scores a composite score of 56/100 — reflecting its safety (52), healthcare (70), and walkability (68) metrics. Layer in taxes, though, and the math changes. affordability and QoL don't always move in the same direction, and United Kingdom is a good example of that tension.
Birmingham has a cost index of 97 (national avg: 103), rent £950/mo, median income £32,200/yr, and a quality of life score of 56/100.
The West Midlands region of average QoL score is 60/100. Birmingham leads with 56/100, reflecting safety, healthcare access, walkability, and green space.
Our index is benchmarked to 100 (national median). Sub-categories cover housing, food, transport, utilities, and healthcare. Data sources include ONS, Land Registry, HMRC.
Birmingham: cost index 97, rent £950/mo, income £32,200/yr, QoL 56/100. Newcastle upon Tyne: cost index 89, rent £800/mo, income £30,500/yr, QoL 63/100.