Loading
Assembling your view…
Crunching costs, sorting signals, rendering insights.
Crunching costs, sorting signals, rendering insights.
Växjö quality of life score: 69/100 (Sweden avg: 69/100). Combines safety (72), healthcare (74), walkability (68), air quality (AQI 7) and green space (45%). Compared to Kronoberg peers in 2026.
Växjö quality of life score: 69/100 (Sweden avg: 69/100). Combines safety (72), healthcare (74), walkability (68), air quality (AQI 7) and green space (45%). Compared to Kronoberg peers in 2026.
Växjö: cost index 95 (-6 vs national avg 101), rent 7 500 kr/month.
Kronoberg region average cost index: 101. Växjö is -6 vs region peers.
Quality of life: 69/100 — safety 72, healthcare 74, walkability 68.
Safety score: 72/100 (crime rate 50.3/1k). National average: 73/100.
| # | City | Cost Index | Rent/mo | Income | QoL | Safety |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Växjö | 95 | 7 500 kr | 357 000 kr | 69 | 72 |
| 2 | Kalmar | 90 | 7 200 kr | 347 000 kr | 72 | 78 |
| 3 | Linköping | 102 | 8 700 kr | 378 000 kr | 71 | 75 |
| 4 | Jönköping | 96 | 7 900 kr | 362 000 kr | 71 | 78 |
| 5 | Umeå | 101 | 8 300 kr | 373 000 kr | 71 | 79 |
| 6 | Karlskrona | 90 | 6 900 kr | 341 000 kr | 71 | 76 |
| 7 | Karlstad | 94 | 7 500 kr | 357 000 kr | 71 | 76 |
| 8 | Östersund | 94 | 7 500 kr | 357 000 kr | 71 | 84 |
| 9 | Lund | 112 | 9 700 kr | 400 000 kr | 70 | 74 |
| 10 | Falun | 93 | 7 500 kr | 357 000 kr | 70 | 80 |
| 11 | Luleå | 96 | 7 600 kr | 378 000 kr | 70 | 82 |
| 12 | Visby | 100 | 8 200 kr | 347 000 kr | 70 | 88 |
| 13 | Uppsala | 114 | 10 400 kr | 405 000 kr | 69 | 73 |
| 14 | Örebro | 97 | 8 000 kr | 362 000 kr | 69 | 70 |
| 15 | Gävle | 93 | 7 500 kr | 352 000 kr | 69 | 68 |
| 16 | Sundsvall | 93 | 7 400 kr | 357 000 kr | 69 | 72 |
| 17 | Gothenburg | 112 | 10 100 kr | 395 000 kr | 68 | 68 |
| 18 | Norrköping | 96 | 8 100 kr | 357 000 kr | 68 | 66 |
| 19 | Halmstad | 104 | 8 700 kr | 383 000 kr | 68 | 76 |
| 20 | Västerås | 99 | 8 000 kr | 362 000 kr | 68 | 68 |
One stat flips the usual narrative: Växjö has a cost index of 95 — 6 points below the Sweden national average of 101. Median income is 357 000 kr with rent at 7 500 kr/month, putting the rent-to-income ratio at 25%. Financially, that's significant.
That said, looking at Kronoberg as a whole, the spread across all 24 cities is 8 points on the cost index. Helsingborg sits at the other end with index 103 and rent of 9 000 kr/mo. This combination is rare — and valuable.
On quality of life, Växjö scores a composite score of 69/100 — reflecting its safety (72), healthcare (74), and walkability (68) metrics. Layer in taxes, though, and the math changes. affordability and QoL don't always move in the same direction, and Sweden is a good example of that tension.
Växjö — cost index 95, rent 7 500 kr/mo, income 357 000 kr, QoL 69/100.
Kalmar — cost index 90, rent 7 200 kr/mo, income 347 000 kr, QoL 72/100.
Linköping — cost index 102, rent 8 700 kr/mo, income 378 000 kr, QoL 71/100.
Jönköping — cost index 96, rent 7 900 kr/mo, income 362 000 kr, QoL 71/100.
Umeå — cost index 101, rent 8 300 kr/mo, income 373 000 kr, QoL 71/100.
Växjö has a composite quality of life score of 69/100, covering safety (72), healthcare (74), walkability (68), air quality, and green space. Sweden average QoL: 69/100.
The Kronoberg region of average QoL score is 69/100. Växjö leads with 69/100, reflecting safety, healthcare access, walkability, and green space.
Our index is benchmarked to 100 (national median). Sub-categories cover housing, food, transport, utilities, and healthcare. Data sources include SCB, Lantmäteriet, Skatteverket.
Växjö: cost index 95, rent 7 500 kr/mo, income 357 000 kr/yr, QoL 69/100. Kalmar: cost index 90, rent 7 200 kr/mo, income 347 000 kr/yr, QoL 72/100.
This analysis uses data from SCB, Lantmäteriet, Skatteverket to rank cities in Sweden. The cost of living index is benchmarked to 100 (national median). Quality of life scores combine safety, healthcare, walkability, air quality, green space, and transit metrics. Salary ranges use national occupation data adjusted for local cost differences. Data is updated regularly to reflect current market conditions.