Assembling your view…
Crunching costs, sorting signals, rendering insights.
Crunching costs, sorting signals, rendering insights.
Umeå walkability score: 72/100, transit score 45/100, average commute 18 min. How walkable is Umeå vs other Västerbotten cities?
Umeå walkability score: 72/100, transit score 45/100, average commute 18 min. How walkable is Umeå vs other Västerbotten cities?
Umeå: cost index 101 (0 vs national avg 101), rent 8 300 kr/month.
Västerbotten region average cost index: 101. Umeå is 0 vs region peers.
Quality of life: 71/100 — safety 79, healthcare 82, walkability 72.
Safety score: 79/100 (crime rate 38.4/1k). National average: 73/100.
Strip away assumptions, and something unexpected emerges. Umeå has a cost index of 101 — 0 points below the Sweden national average of 101. Median income is 373 000 kr with rent at 8 300 kr/month, putting the rent-to-income ratio at 27%. That's a strong position by any measure.
Pair that with the housing data, and the pattern sharpens. looking at Västerbotten as a whole, the spread across all 24 cities is 5 points on the cost index. Luleå sits at the other end with index 96 and rent of 7 600 kr/mo. That's not a marginal difference — it reshapes your monthly budget.
On quality of life, Umeå scores a composite score of 71/100 — reflecting its safety (79), healthcare (82), and walkability (72) metrics. And there's one more thing: affordability and QoL don't always move in the same direction, and Sweden is a good example of that tension.
| # | City | Cost Index | Rent/mo | Income | Walk Score | Transit Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Umeå | 101 | 8 300 kr | 373 000 kr | 72 | 45 |
| 2 | Stockholm | 136 | 13 200 kr | 440 000 kr | 88 | 91 |
| 3 | Lund | 112 | 9 700 kr | 400 000 kr | 86 | 68 |
| 4 | Malmö | 108 | 9 500 kr | 378 000 kr | 84 | 72 |
| 5 | Gothenburg | 112 | 10 100 kr | 395 000 kr | 82 | 78 |
| 6 | Uppsala | 114 | 10 400 kr | 405 000 kr | 82 | 65 |
| 7 | Linköping | 102 | 8 700 kr | 378 000 kr | 78 | 55 |
| 8 | Visby | 100 | 8 200 kr | 347 000 kr | 78 | 20 |
| 9 | Helsingborg | 103 | 9 000 kr | 368 000 kr | 76 | 60 |
| 10 | Örebro | 97 | 8 000 kr | 362 000 kr | 74 | 48 |
| 11 | Norrköping | 96 | 8 100 kr | 357 000 kr | 72 | 50 |
| 12 | Halmstad | 104 | 8 700 kr | 383 000 kr | 72 | 40 |
| 13 | Västerås | 99 | 8 000 kr | 362 000 kr | 72 | 45 |
| 14 | Jönköping | 96 | 7 900 kr | 362 000 kr | 70 | 42 |
| 15 | Kalmar | 90 | 7 200 kr | 347 000 kr | 70 | 32 |
| 16 | Eskilstuna | 96 | 7 700 kr | 357 000 kr | 70 | 42 |
| 17 | Karlstad | 94 | 7 500 kr | 357 000 kr | 70 | 38 |
| 18 | Gävle | 93 | 7 500 kr | 352 000 kr | 68 | 38 |
| 19 | Växjö | 95 | 7 500 kr | 357 000 kr | 68 | 35 |
| 20 | Karlskrona | 90 | 6 900 kr | 341 000 kr | 66 | 30 |
Umeå — cost index 101, rent 8 300 kr/mo, income 373 000 kr, QoL 71/100.
Stockholm — cost index 136, rent 13 200 kr/mo, income 440 000 kr, QoL 66/100.
Lund — cost index 112, rent 9 700 kr/mo, income 400 000 kr, QoL 70/100.
Malmö — cost index 108, rent 9 500 kr/mo, income 378 000 kr, QoL 66/100.
Gothenburg — cost index 112, rent 10 100 kr/mo, income 395 000 kr, QoL 68/100.
Umeå has a cost index of 101 (national avg: 101), rent 8 300 kr/mo, median income 373 000 kr/yr, and a quality of life score of 71/100.
The Västerbotten region of average QoL score is 69/100. Umeå leads with 71/100, reflecting safety, healthcare access, walkability, and green space.
Our index is benchmarked to 100 (national median). Sub-categories cover housing, food, transport, utilities, and healthcare. Data sources include SCB, Lantmäteriet, Skatteverket.
Umeå: cost index 101, rent 8 300 kr/mo, income 373 000 kr/yr, QoL 71/100. Stockholm: cost index 136, rent 13 200 kr/mo, income 440 000 kr/yr, QoL 66/100.
This analysis uses data from SCB, Lantmäteriet, Skatteverket to rank cities in Sweden. The cost of living index is benchmarked to 100 (national median). Quality of life scores combine safety, healthcare, walkability, air quality, green space, and transit metrics. Salary ranges use national occupation data adjusted for local cost differences. Data is updated regularly to reflect current market conditions.