Loading
Assembling your view…
Crunching costs, sorting signals, rendering insights.
Crunching costs, sorting signals, rendering insights.
Växjö vs Kalmar in 2026: cost index 91 vs 87, rent 7 100 kr vs 6 800 kr, income 340 000 kr vs 330 000 kr, QoL 70 vs 72.
Växjö vs Kalmar in 2026: cost index 91 vs 87, rent 7 100 kr vs 6 800 kr, income 340 000 kr vs 330 000 kr, QoL 70 vs 72.
Växjö ranks #1 with a cost index of 91 and rent of 7 100 kr/month.
Average cost index across these cities: 89 (-8 vs national average of 97).
Average quality of life: 71/100. Top: Växjö at 70/100.
Safest city: Kalmar (78/100 safety score).
Here's what the headline numbers don't tell you: Växjö stands out as the top-ranked city in this analysis. With a cost index of 91 and median income of 340 000 kr, it offers below-average costs relative to the rest of Sweden. That gap is hard to ignore.
On quality of life, Kalmar leads with a composite score of 72/100 — reflecting its safety (78), healthcare (72), and walkability (70) metrics. But here's the flip side: affordability and QoL don't always move in the same direction, and Sweden is a good example of that tension.
The country average QoL score is 70/100. Växjö leads with 70/100, reflecting its safety, healthcare access, walkability, and green space.
Our index is benchmarked to 100 (national median). Sub-categories cover housing, food, transport, utilities, and healthcare. Data sources include SCB, Lantmäteriet, Skatteverket.
Växjö (ranked #1) has a cost index of 91 and rent of 7 100 kr/mo. Kalmar (#2) has index 87 and rent 6 800 kr/mo — a 4-point gap.