Loading
Assembling your view…
Crunching costs, sorting signals, rendering insights.
Crunching costs, sorting signals, rendering insights.
Gothenburg vs Umeå in 2026: cost index 108 vs 97, rent 9 500 kr vs 7 800 kr, income 375 000 kr vs 355 000 kr, QoL 69 vs 72.
Gothenburg vs Umeå in 2026: cost index 108 vs 97, rent 9 500 kr vs 7 800 kr, income 375 000 kr vs 355 000 kr, QoL 69 vs 72.
Gothenburg ranks #1 with a cost index of 108 and rent of 9 500 kr/month.
Average cost index across these cities: 103 (+6 vs national average of 97).
Average quality of life: 71/100. Top: Gothenburg at 69/100.
Safest city: Umeå (79/100 safety score).
Most comparisons stop at rent. We didn't. Gothenburg stands out as the top-ranked city in this analysis. With a cost index of 108 and median income of 375 000 kr, it offers competitive value despite costs slightly above the national median. That gap is hard to ignore.
On quality of life, Umeå leads with a composite score of 72/100 — reflecting its safety (79), healthcare (82), and walkability (72) metrics. And here's the trade-off: affordability and QoL don't always move in the same direction, and Sweden is a good example of that tension.
The country average QoL score is 70/100. Gothenburg leads with 69/100, reflecting its safety, healthcare access, walkability, and green space.
Our index is benchmarked to 100 (national median). Sub-categories cover housing, food, transport, utilities, and healthcare. Data sources include SCB, Lantmäteriet, Skatteverket.
Gothenburg (ranked #1) has a cost index of 108 and rent of 9 500 kr/mo. Umeå (#2) has index 97 and rent 7 800 kr/mo — a 11-point gap.