Loading
Assembling your view…
Crunching costs, sorting signals, rendering insights.
Crunching costs, sorting signals, rendering insights.
$1,205/mo — for better or worse — rent gap across the ranking. Rent ranges from $2,150/mo in Worcester to $3,355/mo in Cambridge — a monthly difference of $1,205, or $14,460 per year.
#1 Ranked: Worcester — cost index 114, rent $2,150/mo, income $67,544
$1,205/mo rent gap across the ranking
0 of 4 cities come in below the national cost-of-living average of 112
Data sourced from Census Bureau, Zillow, BLS, and Tax Foundation — current as of 2026
$1,205/mo — for better or worse — rent gap across the ranking. Rent ranges from $2,150/mo in Worcester to $3,355/mo in Cambridge — a monthly difference of $1,205, or $14,460 per year.
Let's be honest: Massachusetts isn't cheap. And from what we can tell, but within that premium market, there are cities where your dollar stretches meaningfully further. Worcester proves it with a cost index of 114, the lowest in Massachusetts, and we've ranked all 4 contenders to help you find the best deal in an expensive landscape.
The #1 spot goes to Worcester, and the breakdown explains why. Renters here pay $2,150/month — costing renters $3,060 more per year compared to the national average. Meanwhile, Utilities is the standout at index 105, keeping costs manageable. The weak spot? Housing at 134. The 38% rent-to-income ratio is a pressure point — for median earners, housing takes more than recommended.
Now, the part that complicates the narrative: State context matters: Massachusetts's 4 cities average a 136 cost index with $2,819/month median rent and $91,243 household income. Boston's biotech boom and old-money pricing. Look at what happens when you add healthcare costs.
If you're ready to act on this, three things to do next: 1) Click into the city pages for the top 3 and check rent trends — direction matters more than the snapshot. 2) Run your income through the salary calculator for a personalized cost comparison. 3) Compare your top two picks head-to-head on our comparison page. The data is here; the decision is yours.
Rent ranges from $2,150/mo in Worcester to $3,355/mo in Cambridge — a monthly difference of $1,205, or $14,460 per year.
Rent in #1-ranked Worcester has increased from $2,097 to $2,150/mo over the past 12 months — a 3% increase. Rising costs may erode its top ranking over time.
Worcester (index 114) and Cambridge (index 160) sit 46 points apart on the cost index — proof that Massachusetts is far from monolithic in affordability.
207,621 residents · Massachusetts
A closer look at Worcester: the cost index of 114 breaks down to a Utilities index of 105 (strongest category) and a Housing index of 134 (weakest). Median rent is $2,150/month — 13% above the national median — while household income sits at $67,544, meaning locals spend about 38% of income on rent. That exceeds the recommended 30% threshold — affordability here depends on earning above the median.
114,296 residents · Massachusetts
A closer look at Lowell: the cost index of 118 breaks down to a Utilities index of 108 (strongest category) and a Housing index of 144 (weakest). That tracks. Median rent is $2,262/month — 19% above the national median — while household income sits at $76,205, meaning locals spend about 36% of income on rent. That exceeds the recommended 30% threshold — affordability here depends on earning above the median.
653,833 residents · Massachusetts
In plain English: the #3 spot goes to Boston, and the breakdown explains why. Renters here pay $3,510/month — costing renters $19,380 more per year compared to the national average. Meanwhile, Utilities is the standout at index 139, keeping costs manageable. The weak spot? Housing at 228. The 44% rent-to-income ratio is a pressure point — for median earners, housing takes more than recommended.
118,214 residents · Massachusetts
A closer look at Cambridge: the cost index of 160 breaks down to a Utilities index of 148 (strongest category) and a Housing index of 251 (weakest). And roughly speaking, median rent is $3,355/month — 77% above the national median — while household income sits at $126,469, meaning locals spend about 32% of income on rent. That exceeds the recommended 30% threshold — affordability here depends on earning above the median.
Worcester ranks #1 in Massachusetts for this analysis with a cost index of 114 and median income of $67,544.
Our cost of living index uses real Zillow rent data as the foundation, indexed to 100 (national median). Sub-categories (housing, food, transport, utilities, healthcare) are derived from the overall index with regional adjustments. Data is updated monthly.
Worcester (ranked #1) has a cost index of 114 and rent of $2,150/mo, while Cambridge (ranked #4) has a cost index of 160 and rent of $3,355/mo — a 46-point difference in cost of living.
City data is refreshed monthly from Census Bureau population estimates, Zillow rent and home price indices, BLS salary data, and Tax Foundation tax rates. Last updated: 2026.
The median 1-bedroom rent in Worcester is $2,150/month as of 2026, based on Zillow's Observed Rent Index. This is $255 above the national median of $1,895/month.
The median home price in Worcester is $423,326, which is 6.3× the local median income. Most median-income households would stretch to buy at this ratio. The national median home price is $467,370.
Massachusetts has a 5% state income tax rate. Combined state and local sales tax averages 6.25%, and the effective property tax rate is 1.04%.
This ranking was generated using data current as of early 2026. Population and income data comes from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (5-year estimates). Rent and home price data is from Zillow's monthly releases. Tax rates are from the Tax Foundation's 2025 edition. Rankings are refreshed monthly.