Loading
Assembling your view…
Crunching costs, sorting signals, rendering insights.
Crunching costs, sorting signals, rendering insights.
Melbourne vs Wollongong in 2026: cost index 118 vs 108, rent $2,400 vs $2,050, income $80,000 vs $70,000, QoL 63 vs 65.
Melbourne vs Wollongong in 2026: cost index 118 vs 108, rent $2,400 vs $2,050, income $80,000 vs $70,000, QoL 63 vs 65.
Melbourne ranks #1 with a cost index of 118 and rent of $2,400/month.
Average cost index across these cities: 113 (+6 vs national average of 107).
Average quality of life: 64/100. Top: Melbourne at 63/100.
Safest city: Wollongong (72/100 safety score).
Strip away assumptions, and something unexpected emerges. Melbourne stands out as the top-ranked city in this analysis. With a cost index of 118 and median income of $80,000, it offers competitive value despite costs slightly above the national median. This combination is rare — and valuable.
On quality of life, Wollongong leads with a composite score of 65/100 — reflecting its safety (72), healthcare (72), and walkability (58) metrics. Here's where it gets complicated: affordability and QoL don't always move in the same direction, and Australia is a good example of that tension.
The country average QoL score is 64/100. Melbourne leads with 63/100, reflecting its safety, healthcare access, walkability, and green space.
Our index is benchmarked to 100 (national median). Sub-categories cover housing, food, transport, utilities, and healthcare. Data sources include ABS, CoreLogic, ATO.
Melbourne (ranked #1) has a cost index of 118 and rent of $2,400/mo. Wollongong (#2) has index 108 and rent $2,050/mo — a 10-point gap.